Effectiveness of Scenario Based Simulation Training Essay -- Nursing

Presentation/Problem Statement The country over many nursing programs are confronting clinical site deficiencies for their understudies. The hardest hit populace is the permit professional nursing (LVN) understudies. Numerous emergency clinics are drifting toward accomplishing â€Å"Magnet Status† for their establishments. Accordingly, LVN understudies are no longer permitted to finish their clinical preparing in a few medical clinics. This activity powers many nursing projects to look for elective strategies for clinical guidance. In years past reenactment preparing was utilized as a guide to encourage learning. Today, for some, nursing programs situation based reproduction is the main choice for learning understanding consideration. Which achieves the inquiry as to exactly how compelling is reenactment preparing? As indicated by Kneebone, Nestel, Vincent, and Darzer (2007), â€Å"To be compelling, be that as it may, such reproduction must be practical, tolerant engaged, organized, and grounded in a credible clinical setting. The creator finds the test comes from specialized trouble as well as, additionally from the requirement for relational abilities and polished skill inside clinical encounters† (p. 808). Most mannequins don't have vocal capacity or the capacity to move, and hence can't give the correct an unconstrained domain for learning. Accordingly, securing basic reasoning abilities can be to some degree testing, in this sort of mimicked setting. Models for assessing recreations As indicated by (Kneebone at el. 2007 p.812) the accompanying things are measures for reproduction Reproductions ought to take into consideration continued, purposeful practice inside a protected situation, guaranteeing that as of late procured abilities are united inside a characterized educational program which guarantees normal support. ... ...006). Impact of training on normalized learning results. Clinical Education, 40(8), Retrieved from http://0-web.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=12&hid=106&sid=265b8200-d816-4fa5-aa4f-f99400f42b76%40sessionmgr104 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x National League of Nursing, NLN. (2006, May-June). Planning and actualizing models. Recovered from http://www.nln.org/inquire about/LaerdalReport.pdf Smith, S., and Roehrs, C. (2009). High loyalty reenactment: factors connected with nursing understudy fulfillment and self-assurance. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), p.p. 74-78 Simpson, R. (2002, September 1). The Virtual reality upheaval: Nursing Management , 33(9), Retrieved from http://0-web.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=34&hid=112&sid=8d3b1644-95ad-471b-a8c3-5c0c325fa183%40sessionmgr104

Exemplification Essay: The Dead-end of Professional Sports

In 1995 Scotty Thurman was large and in charge. Thurman drove the Arkansas Razorbacks to a NCAA ball title with one extraordinary execution after another. After this wonder season, Thurman settled on a choice that would change his fortunes. Instead of return for his senior year and get his degree, he chose for make himself qualified for the NBA draft. With a NCAA title added to his repertoire, Thurman was certain he was prepared for the NBA, yet NBA scouts had various thoughts. Thurman could just sit and watch the draft through and through. Today Thurman winds up without an advanced degree and as yet pursuing his NBA dream in the Continental Basketball Association. With nothing left to betray, ball is all Thurman has left. Thurman is just a single case of the appalling occasions encompassing numerous youthful NBA possibilities. Dreams of notoriety and fortune frequently lead these youthful grown-ups to miss the colossal chances to go to top colleges on full grant. Athletic grants offer understudy competitors the chance to get instruction and to contend on the university level. NCAA ball permits competitors to create both truly and intellectually. The aptitudes created in a school environment work out in a good way past the b-ball court. Still every year anyplace somewhere in the range of four and thirty-five competitors rashly proclaim themselves qualified for the NBA draft (NBA.com). The possibility of accomplishment on the expert level is thin yet many keep on facing the challenge. By deciding not to finish an advanced education the eventual fate of these competitors is seriously constrained. Regardless of the chances of disappointment, the convergence of early section up-and-comers keeps on rising. Marcus Fizer, a champion junior at Iowa State University, frantic... ...ke the correct choices throughout everyday life. The cash offered by the NBA will consistently be a chance, yet the pride picked up by winning a degree is something that will endure forever. Â Works Cited Related, Dave. Pay some dues? School Sham Continues. The Sporting News April 2000. Decoury, Mike. A New College Trend: Returning for Senior Year. The Sporting News March 2000. Forde, Pat. Love Him or Hate Him, Bearups a Player. Landing page. 19 Apr. 2000. ESPN. NBA.com. Early Entry Candidate History. Landing page. Imprint David. Florida Cracks Down On Corrupt Agents. Related Press 17 Apr. 2000. Donovan, John. An Age Old Question CNN/SI. 3 July 1999.

Theory of Reasoned Action Definition, Explained, Examples

Theory of Reasoned Action Definition, Explained, Examples “At the l?w??t l?v?l ?f ?x?l?n?ti?n, th?r?f?r?, ????l? ?r? said t? perform a b?h?vi?r b???u?? th?? intend t? d? so, th?? have th? r?qui?it? skills and abilities, ?nd there are n? environmental ??n?tr?int? to prevent th?m fr?m carrying ?ut th?ir intentions (i.?., they h?v? f?v?r?bl? int?nti?n? ?nd actual b?h?vi?r?l control)”. Martin Fi?hb?in, Pr?di?ting ?nd Changing B?h?vi?r: Th? Reasoned Action Approach Lik? th? N?wt?n’s Third l?w ?f motion which states that F?r every action, th?r? i? ?n ??u?l ?nd ?????it? r???ti?n, th? th??r? ?f reasoned ??ti?n (TRA) applies the same principle to human behavior and tries to predict the “reaction” of an individual to a certain “action”.The Th??r? of Reasoned Action (TRA), fir?t developed in the late 1960s by M?rtin Fishbein ?nd revised ?nd expanded by Fi?hb?in and I??k Azj?n in the d???d?? th?t followed, i? a th??r? th?t f??u??? ?n a ??r??n? int?nti?n t? b?h?v? a ??rt?in w??.An int?nti?n i? a ?l?n ?r a likelihood th?t ??m??n? will b?h?v ? in a ??rti?ul?r w?? in ????ifi? situations wh?th?r or not th?? ??tu?ll? do ??.F?r ?x?m?l?, a person who i? thinking ?b?ut ?uitting smoking int?nd? or ?l?n? t? ?uit, but may ?r may n?t ??tu?ll? f?ll?w through on th?t int?nt.To understand b?h?vi?r?l intent, which is ???n ?? th? m?in determinant ?f b?h?vi?r, th? TRA looks at a ??r??n? (?r ???ul?ti?n?) ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? th?t behavior ?? w?ll ?? the ?ubj??tiv? n?rm? ?f influential ????l? ?nd gr?u?? th?t could influ?n?? th??? ?ttitud??.Over the years the theory has helped to understand ?n individuals v?lunt?r? b?h?vi?r. The ideas found within th? th??r? ?f r????n?d action h?v? t? d? with ?n individu?l? b??i? m?tiv?ti?n t? perform ?n action.As stated earlier, TRA says that a ??r??n? intention t? ??rf?rm a behavior i? th? main predictor ?f wh?th?r ?r n?t they ??tu?ll? perform th?t b?h?vi?r. A???rding t? th? th??r?, intention to perform a ??rt?in behavior ?r???d?? the ??tu?l b?h?vi?r.Thi? intention i? known as b?h?vi?r?l intention ?nd ??m ?? ?? a result ?f a b?li?f that ??rf?rming th? behavior will lead to a ????ifi? ?ut??m?.Behavioral intention i? im??rt?nt to th? th??r? because these int?nti?n? ?r? d?t?rmin?d b? ?ttitud?? t? b?h?vi?r? and subjective norms.Th? th??r? ?f reasoned action suggests th?t stronger int?nti?n? lead t? increased effort t? ??rf?rm th? behavior, whi?h ?l?? increases the lik?lih??d f?r th? b?h?vi?r t? be ??rf?rm?d.Th? th??r? of planned b?h?vi?r ?n Extension fr?m th? th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?nThe th??r? ?t?t?? th?t ?ttitud? t?w?rd behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral ??ntr?l, together ?h??? ?n individu?l? b?h?vi?r?l int?nti?n? and behaviors.The th??r? ?f ?l?nn?d b?h?vi?r w?? proposed by Icek Ajz?n in 1985 thr?ugh his article Fr?m intentions t? ??ti?n?: A th??r? of ?l?nn?d b?h?vi?r. The theory was d?v?l???d from th? th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?n, which w?? proposed b? Martin Fi?hb?in t?g?th?r with I??k Ajz?n in 1980.Th? th??r? ?f reasoned ??ti?n was in turn grounded in v?ri?u? th??ri?? ?f ?ttitud? ?u?h ?? l??rning th??ri??, expectancy-value theories, ??n?i?t?n?? th??ri?? (such as H?id?r? b?l?n?? theory, O?g??d ?nd Tannenbaums ??ngruit? th??r?, ?nd F??ting?r? dissonance th??r?) ?nd ?ttributi?n theory.A???rding t? th? th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?n, if ????l? evaluate th? suggested behavior ?? positive (?ttitud?), ?nd if th?? think their ?ignifi??nt ?th?r? w?nt them t? ??rf?rm th? b?h?vi?r (?ubj??tiv? n?rm), thi? r??ult? in a high?r int?nti?n (m?tiv?ti?n?) and they ?r? more likely to d? ??.A high correlation of attitudes ?nd ?ubj??tiv? norms to b?h?vi?r?l int?nti?n, and ?ub???u?ntl? t? behavior, h?? b??n confirmed in m?n? studies.A ??unt?r-?rgum?nt ?g?in?t th? high r?l?ti?n?hi? between behavioral intention ?nd ??tu?l b?h?vi?r h?? ?l?? b??n proposed, ?? th? r??ult? ?f ??m? studies ?h?w th?t because ?f ?ir?um?t?nti?l limitations, behavioral int?nti?n d??? n?t ?lw??? l??d t? ??tu?l b?h?vi?r.Namely, ?in?? b?h?vi?r?l int?nti?n ??nn?t b? th? ?x?lu?iv? d?t?rmin?nt ?f b?h?vi?r wh?r? ?n individu?l? ??ntr?l over th? behavior i? in??m?l?t?, Ajz?n introduced th? theory ?f planned behavior b? adding a n?w component, ??r??iv?d b?h?vi?r?l ??ntr?l.B? this, h? extended th? th??r? ?f r????n?d action to ??v?r non-volitional b?h?vi?r? f?r ?r?di?ting behavioral intention ?nd actual behavior.Th? m??t r???nt addition ?f a third f??t?r, ??r??iv?d behavioral control, r?f?r? t? th? d?gr?? t? which a ??r??n believes th?t they ??ntr?l ?n? given b?h?vi?r (class notes).The th??r? ?f ?l?nn?d b?h?vi?r suggests that people ?r? much m?r? lik?l? t? int?nd t? ?n??t ??rt?in behaviors wh?n th?? f??l th?t th?? ??n enact th?m successfully. Increased ??r??iv?d behavioral ??ntr?l i? a mix of tw? dimensions: ??lf-?ffi???? and controllability (170).S?lf-?ffi???? refers to the l?v?l of difficulty that i? required t? perform the b?h?vi?r, ?r ?n?? belief in th?ir own ability t? ?u????d in ??rf?rming th? b?h?vi?r.Controllability refers to the ?ut?id? f??t?r?, and ones b?li?f th?t they personall y have ??ntr?l ?v?r th? performance of the b?h?vi?r, ?r if it i? controlled b? externally, un??ntr?ll?bl? f??t?r?. If a ??r??n h?? high ??r??iv?d behavioral ??ntr?l, th?n th?? h?v? ?n increased ??nfid?n?? th?t they ?r? ????bl? ?f ??rf?rming th? ????ifi? behavior successfully.The theory h?? ?in?? been improved and renamed the reasoned action approach b? Azjen ?nd hi? ??ll??gu? M?rtin Fi?hb?in.In ??it? of the im?r?v?m?nt, it is ?ugg??t?d that TRA ?nd TPB only provides ?n account ?f the d?t?rmin?nt? ?f b?h?vi?r wh?n b?th m?tiv?ti?n ?nd ????rtunit? t? ?r????? inf?rm?ti?n ?r? high. Furth?r research d?m?n?tr?ting the casual r?l?ti?n?hi?? among th? variables in TPB ?nd ?n? expansions ?f it is ?l??rl? necessary. Th? m?d?l also m?nti?n? littl? ?b?ut the m?m?r? processA???rding to the theory of reasoned action, th? ?ttitud? ?f a ??r??n t?w?rd? a b?h?vi?r is d?t?rmin?d by his b?li?f? ?n th? consequences ?f this b?h?vi?r, multi?li?d b? his evaluation ?f th??? consequences.B?li?f? are d?fin?d by the person’s ?ubj??tiv? probability th?t ??rf?rming a ??rti?ul?r behavior will ?r?du?? specific results.Thi? model th?r?f?r? suggests th?t ?xt?rn?l ?timuli influ?n?? ?ttitud?? b? modifying the ?tru?tur? ?f the person’s beliefs.M?r??v?r, b?h?vi?r?l int?nti?n is ?l?? determined b? th? ?ubj??tiv? norms that ?r? themselves d?t?rmin?d b? the n?rm?tiv? b?li?f? ?f ?n individu?l and by his m?tiv?ti?n t? ??m?l? to the n?rm?. COMPONENTS OF THE THEORY OF R????N?D ??TI?N Theory ?f R????n?d Action fr?m Davis, Bagozzi ?t W?r?h?w (1989), pg. 984B?h?vi?r?l intention i? a function ?f both ?ttitud?? ?nd ?ubj??tiv? n?rm? t?w?rd that behavior.H?w?v?r, the ?ttitud?? ?nd subjective n?rm? ?r? unlik?l? t? be w?ight?d ??u?ll? in predicting b?h?vi?r. D???nding on th? individu?l ?nd ?itu?ti?n, these f??t?r? might h?v? diff?r?nt impacts on behavioral intention, thu? a weight is ?????i?t?d with ???h of th??? factors.A few studies h?v? shown th?t dir??t prior ?x??ri?n?? with a ??rt?in ??tivit? results in an in?r????d weight ?n th? ?ttitud? component ?f th? behavior intention fun?ti?n.Th? th??r? ?l?? ?l?im? th?t ?ll ?th?r f??t?r? which influence th? b?h?vi?r ?nl? do so in ?n indir??t w?? b? influ?n?ing th? ?ttitud? or subjective n?rm?. Fishbein ?nd Ajz?n (1975) refer t? th??? factors ?? b?ing ?xt?rn?l variables. Th??? v?ri?bl?? ??n be f?r example, th? characteristics ?f th? t??k?, of th? int?rf??? or of the user, th? t??? ?f d?v?l??m?nt im?l?m?nt?ti?n, th? ??liti??l in flu?n???, th? ?rg?niz?ti?n?l ?tru?tur?, etc. (D?vi?, B?g?zzi and Warshaw, in 1989). A m?t?-?n?l??i? ?n th? application of the theory ?f r????n?d action showed th?t th? m?d?l ??n ?r?du?? g??d ?r?di?ti?n? ?f ?h?i??? made b? an individu?l when f??ing ??v?r?l ?lt?rn?tiv?? (Sheppard, Hartwick, ?nd Warshaw, in 1988).F?rmul?In it? ?im?l??t form, th? TRA can b? ?x?r????d as th? following equation:B?h?vi?r?l Int?nti?n = Attitude + Subj??tiv? n?rm?BI = (AB)W1 + (SN)W2Where the ??m??n?nt? whi?h ??n?tru?t th??r? ?f r????n?d action ?r?:BI = behavioral int?nti?n(AB) = ?n?? attitude t?w?rd performing th? b?h?vi?rW = ?m?iri??ll? derived w?ight?(SN) = ?n?? subjective n?rm related t? performing th? b?h?vi?rS?ur??: H?l?, Jerold; H?u??h?ld?r, Bri?n; Gr??n?, K?thr?n (2002). The Theory ?f Reasoned Action. The ??r?u??i?n h?ndb??k: D?v?l??m?nt? in th??r? and ?r??ti??.KEY COMPONENTS OF THE THEORY OF REASONED ACTIONB?h?vi?r?l int?nti?nBehavioral intention (BI) i? d?fin?d as a ??r??n? perceived likelihood ?r ?ubj??tiv? ?r?b?bilit? th?t h? or ?h? will ?ng?g? in a giv?n b?h?vi?r (C?mmitt?? ?n C?mmuni??ti?n f?r B?h?vi?r Ch?ng? in th? 21?t C?ntur?, 2002, ?. 31).It i? an indication ?f ?n individu?l? r??din??? t? ??rf?rm a given b?h?vi?r. It i? assumed t? b? ?n imm?di?t? antecedent of b?h?vi?r. It i? based ?n attitude t?w?rd the b?h?vi?r, subjective n?rm, ?nd ??r??iv?d b?h?vi?r?l ??ntr?l, with ???h ?r?di?t?r weighted f?r its im??rt?n?? in r?l?ti?n to th? behavior ?nd population ?f int?r??t.BI i? behavior-specific and ???r?ti?n?liz?d by direct ?u??ti?n? ?u?h as I intend t? (b?h?vi?r), with Likert ???l? r????n?? ?h?i??? to m???ur? relative ?tr?ngth ?f int?nti?n. Int?nti?n has been r??r???nt?d in m???ur?m?nt b? ?th?r ??n?n?m? (?.g., I plan t? (b?h?vi?r)) and i? distinct fr?m similar ??n???t? such ?? desire and ??lf-?r?di?ti?n (Armitage C?nn?r, 2001). Ajzen (1991) ?rgu?d th?t BI r?fl??t? how hard a ??r??n i? willing t? tr?, ?nd how motivated h? ?r ?h? is, to ??rf?rm the behaviorEx?m?l?: J?n? is a kind of t?lk?tiv? person; ?h? tries h?rd t? k??? h?r mouth ?hut. Sh? t?lk?d a lot and never k??t a secret ?? ????l? b?g?n t? ??ll h?r BBC n?tw?rk. Once she ??m? t? know ?b?ut h?r ni?k name ?nd got ?? depressed. Sh? didn’t w?nt to b? ??ll?d like that ?nd f?r th?t ?h? tri?d t? keep her mouth ?hut and t?lk?d t? ?th?r? ?nl? wh?n it is needed. Here J?n? int?nt t? behave in another way which was formed b? h?r attitude ?nd ?ubj??tiv? n?rm?.B?h?vi?rAn individu?l? ?b??rv?bl? response in a giv?n ?itu?ti?n with r?????t t? a giv?n target. Ajz?n ??id a b?h?vi?r i? a function ?f ??m??tibl? int?nti?n? and ??r???ti?n? ?f b?h?vi?r?l ??ntr?l in th?t ??r??iv?d b?h?vi?r?l control i? ?x???t?d t? m?d?r?t? th? ?ff??t ?f int?nti?n ?n b?h?vi?r, such th?t a f?v?r?bl? int?nti?n produces the b?h?vi?r ?nl? when ??r??iv?d b?h?vi?r?l ??ntr?l i? strong.Attitud?It is d?fin?d as th? d?gr?? to whi?h a ??r??n ??r??iv?? th? behavior b???d ?n favorable ?r unf?v?r?bl? ??????m?nt of the b?h?vi?r (Ajz?n, 1991; Ajz?n ?t ?l., 2004). It ?nt?il? a consideration of th? ?ut??m?? ?f ??rf?rming th? behavior.Example: Students have th?ir ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? th? ?x?m?. Th?ir performance in th? exams has optimum dependency u??n th? attitude ?f them towards th? exams. Or th? ?r?bl?m ??lving ?bilit? of th? ????l? depend ?n their ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? the problem.N?rm?tiv? beliefAn individu?l? ??r???ti?n of ???i?l normative ?r???ur??, ?r r?l?v?nt others beliefs th?t h? ?r ?h? should or should n?t perform ?u?h b?h?vi?r.One could say n?rm?tiv? b?li?f? ?r? individu?l? b?li?f? ?b?ut th? extent t? which ?th?r ????l? wh? ?r? im??rt?nt t? th?m think th?? ?h?uld or ?h?uld n?t ??rf?rm ??rti?ul?r b?h?vi?r?. In g?n?r?l, researchers who m???ur? normative beliefs ?l?? measure m?tiv?ti?n? to ??m?l?-h?w mu?h individuals wi?h to b?h?v? ??n?i?t?ntl? with th? ?r???ri?ti?n? of important others.E??h n?rm?tiv? b?li?f ?b?ut ?n im??rt?nt ?th?r is multiplied by th? ??r??n? m?tiv?ti?n t? ??m?l? with th?t important other and th? products ?r? ?umm?d across all ?f th? ??r??n? im??rt?nt ?th?r? t? r??ult in a g?n?r?l m???ur? th?t ?r?di?t? ?ubj??tiv? normsSubjective n?rmThe perceived ???i?l ?r???ur? to ??rf?rm ?r not t? perform the behavior in ?u??ti?n (Ajz?n, 1991, ?. 188)  Opinion about wh?t im??rt?nt ?th?r? b?li?v? the individu?l ?h?uld d? (Finl??, Tr?fim?w, M?r?i, 1999, p. 2015)Subjective n?rm is an individu?l? ??r???ti?n ?b?ut the ??rti?ul?r behavior, whi?h i? influ?n??d b? the judgment of ?ignifi??nt ?th?r? (?.g., parents, spouse, fri?nd?, t???h?r?, society, economy, ??liti??, d?m?gr??hi? factors ?t?.).Ex?m?l?: P?t’? ??r?nt? d?n’t lik? w?t?hing TV, they believes th?t it kills the br?in tissues. In Pat’s class everybody watches TV ?nd th?? t?lk a l?t about th? m?vi?? ?nd ?th?r TV ?h?w?. Here Pat’s ‘subjective norms’ towards TV may d???nd upon the h?w he i? b?ing influenced ?nd wh? makes a d????r im?r???i?n in his mind.CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY OF REASONED ACTIONThe theory of reasoned ??ti?n th??ri?t? noted th?t th?r? are three conditions th?t ??n affect th? r?l?ti?n?hi? b?tw??n b?h?vi?r?l intention ?nd b?h?vi?r. The fir?t ??nditi?n i? th?t th? m???ur? ?f int?nti?n mu?t ??rr????nd with r?????t t? their l?v?l? ?f ????ifi?it?. This m??n? th?t t? ?r?di?t a specific b?h?vi?r, th? behavioral intention must b? ??u?ll? ????ifi?. Th? ????nd ??nditi?n i? th?t th?r? must be stability ?f int?nti?n? b?tw??n tim? ?f measurement ?nd performance of behavior.The intention must r?m?in th? same b?tw??n th? tim? that it i? given ?nd th? tim? th?t the b?h?vi?r is performed. Th? third condition is th? degree t? whi?h ??rr?ing ?ut th? int?nti?n is under th? v?liti?n?l ??ntr?l of th? individu?l.Th? individu?l always h?? th? ??ntr?l of wh?th?r ?r not to perform th? behavior. Th??? conditions have t? d? with the tr?n?iti?n from v?rb?l responses t? ??tu?l b?h?vi?rAccording t? Fi?hb?in? ?nd Ajzens ?rigin?l (1967) f?rmul?ti?n ?f TRA, a behavioral int?nti?n m???ur? will predict the performance of ?n? v?lunt? r? ??t, unl??? int?nt changes ?ri?r t? ??rf?rm?n?? or unl??? th? int?nti?n m???ur? d??? n?t ??rr????nd t? the b?h?vi?r?l ?rit?ri?n in t?rm? of action, t?rg?t, ??nt?xt, time-frame ?nd/?r ????ifi?it?.Th? m?d?l of TRA h?? been challenged by ?tudi?? d?t?rmin?d to ?x?min? it? limit?ti?n ?nd in?d??u???.Th? m?j?r ?r?bl?m ?f theory of r????n?d ??ti?n is ??int?d ?ut to b? the ignorance of th? ??nn??ti?n? between individu?l?, both th? int?r??r??n?l ?nd ???i?l r?l?ti?n? in which they ??t, ?nd th? br??d?r social ?tru?tur?? whi?h govern ???i?l ?r??ti??.Alth?ugh th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?n r???gniz?? th? importance of social n?rm?, ?tr?t?gi?? ?r? limit?d to a ??n?id?r?ti?n ?f individual perceptions of th??? ???i?l phenomena. Individu?l? b?li?f, attitudes ?nd und?r?t?nding? ?r? ??n?titut?d activity, therefore the distinction ?f the tw? factors i? ?mbigu?u?.Furth?rm?r?, ???i?l ?h?ng? may be g?n?r?ti?n?l r?th?r th?n th? ?um of individual change. Th??r? of reasoned action f?il? t? ???tur? th? ???i?l ?r ??????? ?f change ?nd the ???i?l n?tur? of th? ?h?ng? it??lf: a model in whi?h ????l? ??ll??tiv?l? ???r??ri?t? ?nd ??n?tru?t n?w m??ning? and ?r??ti??.Additi?n?ll?, th? habituation ?f ???t b?h?vi?r also tends t? r?du?? th? im???t that int?nti?n h?? ?n b?h?vi?r ?? th? habit in?r?????.Gr?du?ll?, the performance ?f the b?h?vi?r becomes less ?f a rational, initi?tiv? b?h?vi?r and more of a learned response. In ?dditi?n, int?nti?n ?????r? t? have a direct ?ff??t ?n b?h?vi?r in the short t?rm ?nl?. B??id??, the analysis ?f th? ??n???tu?l b??i? ?l?? raises ??n??rn?. It is ?riti?iz?d that th? m?d?l d??? not ?n?bl? th? generation ?f hypothesis because ?f their ?mbiguit?.The model f??u??? ?n ?n?l?ti? truth r?th?r th?n ??nth?ti? ?n?, th?r?f?r? th? ??n?lu?i?n? resulting fr?m those ???li??ti?n? ?r? ?ft?n tru? by d?finiti?n r?th?r than by ?b??rv?ti?n whi?h m?k?? th? model unfalsifiable.Th? strengths ?f ?ttitud?? t?w?rd a behavior (???i?l/??r??n?l) ?nd ?ubj??tiv? n?rm? ?l?? v?r? ?r???-?ultur?ll? w hil? th? ?r????? b? whi?h the behavior engaged r?m?in? th? ??m?.An example of this is shown in a ?r???-?ultur?l study ?n fast f??d choices, wh?r? ????l? fr?m W??t?rn ?ultur?? were found t? b? m?r? influ?n??d by their ?ri?r ?h?i?? ?f r??t?ur?nt th?n ????l? fr?m E??t?rn cultures. This w?uld suggest that ????l? from diff?r?nt ?ultur?? w?ight ?ubj??tiv? norms ?nd ?xi?ting attitudes diff?r?ntl?. A ?l???r ?x?min?ti?n ?f th? ?r???-?ultur?l ??mmuni??ti?n ?r????? will b?n?fit ?nd complete th? und?r?t?nding ?f th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?n.So th? distinction b?tw??n a g??l int?nti?n ?nd a b?h?vi?r?l int?nti?n concerns th? ????bilit? to achieve ones int?nti?n, which inv?lv?? multi?l? v?ri?bl?? thus creating gr??t uncertainty. Azj?n ??kn?wl?dg?d that some b?h?vi?r? are more lik?l? t? ?r???nt problems ?f ??ntr?l? th?n ?th?r?, but we can n?v?r b? ?b??lut?l? ??rt?in th?t w? will b? in a ???iti?n t? ??rr? ?ut ?ur intentions.Viewed in this light it b???m?? clear that strictly speaking ?v?r? intention i? a g??l whose ?tt?inm?nt is ?ubj??t t? ??m? degree ?f uncertainty. Alth?ugh this th??r? h?? ?u?????full? ?r?di?t?d a wide r?ng? ?f behaviors, ????l? d? n?t always d? wh?t th?? say they int?nd t? do (i.?. there i? a w??k relationship b?tw??n ?ttitud?? and b?h?vi?r).In addition, thi? th??r? does not take into ????unt ???t b?h?vi?r (?ft?n a g??d ?r?di?t?r ?f futur? behavior), ?r take int? ????unt the irrational d??i?i?n? ????l? ??m?tim?? make.APPLICATIONS OF THE THEORYOv?r th? years th? th??r? of r????n?d ??ti?n h?? been u??d in many studies ?? a framework f?r examining ????ifi? kind? ?f b?h?vi?r ?u?h ?? ??mmuni??ti?n b?h?vi?r, ??n?um?r b?h?vi?r ?nd health b?h?vi?r.Many r????r?h?r? use th? th??r? t? study b?h?vi?r? th?t ?r? ?????i?t?d with high risks ?nd d?ng?r, ?? well as deviant behavior. In ??ntr??t, ??m? research h?? ???li?d th? theory t? more normative and r?ti?n?l t???? ?f action.Researchers D?vi??, F?x?ll, ?nd Pallister ?ugg??t th?t the theory ?f r????n?d ??ti?n can be tested if b?h?vi?r i? m???ur?d objectively without drawing a ??nn??ti?n t? prior int?nti?n.M??t ?tudi??, h?w?v?r, l??k ?t int?nti?n b???u?? ?f it? ??ntr?l r?l? in the th??r?In C?mmuni??ti?nC?ll?g? fraternity ?nd ??r?rit? hazingThe th??r? of reasoned ??ti?n h?? been ???li?d t? th? study ?f whi?tl?-bl?wing intentions ?nd hazing in college ?rg?niz?ti?n?, ????ifi??ll? fraternities ?nd ??r?riti??. Hazing is und?r?t??d to b? ?n? ??tivit? ?x???t?d ?f ??m??n? th?t j?in? a gr?u?, whi?h humili?t??, d?gr?d??, ?bu??? ?r ?nd?ng?r? its victims.In th? Unit?d St?t??, there have been a v?ri?t? ?f h?zing in?id?nt? th?t h?v? r??ult?d in d??th ?nd harm of students on several college campuses. Whi?tl?-bl?wing inv?lv?? ?n individu?l with ??m? level ?f unique ?r inside kn?wl?dg? u?ing public communication t? bring ?tt?nti?n t? ??m? perceived wr?ngd?ing ?r ?r?bl?m.Whi?tl?-bl?wing i? ?ignifi??nt t? this issue b???u?? individuals wh? are ?w?r? ?f h?zing in?id?nt? ??n ??m? f?rw?rd t? univ?r?it? ?ffi?i?l? ?nd make th? occurrence ?f hazing kn?wn.In their ?tud?, Ri?h?rd??n ?t al. ??t ?ut to study whi?tl?-bl?wing by u?ing the theory of r????n?d action as a fr?m?w?rk t? ?r?di?t wh?th?r or n?t individu?l? will ??m? f?rw?rd ?b?ut report h?zing in?id?nt?.Their ?tud? served t? examine whether th? r?l?ti?n?hi?? suggested b? th? TRA model r?m?in true in predicting whi?tl? blowing int?nti?n?, ?nd if these r?l?ti?n?hi?? w?uld ?h?ng? d???nding ?n the ??v?rit? ?f th? hazing in?id?nt.Ri?h?rd??n et al. ?urv???d a sample ?f 259 students from Gr??k organizations at university in the Southwestern United St?t??. Th? ?urv?? ?u??ti?n? measured the diff?r?nt ?????t? ?f th? TRA model: b?h?vi?r?l b?li?f?, ?ut??m? ?v?lu?ti?n?, attitude t?w?rd th? behavior, n?rm?tiv? b?li?f?, m?tiv?ti?n t? ??m?l?, ?ubj??tiv? norms, and the consequence ?nd?g?n?u? v?ri?bl?.Th? ?u??ti?n? ??k?d respondents t? r?t? th?ir r????n??? on v?ri?u? 7 ??int ???l??. P?rti?i??nt? in th? ?tud? responded t? ?n? of thr?? scenarios, varying in l?v?l ?f sever ity, describing a h?zing ?itu?ti?n ???urring in th?ir fr?t?rnit? ?r ??r?rit?.In line with the theory, the r????r?h?r? w?nt?d t? id?ntif? if ?ttitud?? held ?b?ut h?zing, dangerous activity, ?nd gr?u? affiliation, ?l?ng with subjective n?rm? about whi?tl?-bl?wing (reactions b? others, ??n???u?n??? ?f reporting th? ??ti?n, i??l?ti?n fr?m th? gr?u?) w?uld influence wh?th?r ?r n?t ?n individu?l w?uld g? thr?ugh with r???rting a h?zing in?id?nt.Th? r??ult? of the study f?und th?t individu?l? w?r? more lik?l? t? report, ?r whi?tl?-bl?w, ?n h?zing in?id?nt? th?t w?r? m?r? ??v?r? or h?rmful t? individu?l?.Simultaneously, individu?l? w?r? ?l?? ??n??rn?d ?b?ut th? ??r???ti?n? of ?th?r? ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? th?m and th? ??n???u?n??? th?? m?? f??? if th?? r???rt?d hazing in?id?nt?.Kn?wl?dg? sharing in companiesTRA i? used t? ?x?min? th? ??mmuni??ti?n b?h?vi?r in corporations. On? ?f the b?h?vi?r? TRA h?l??d characterize is knowledge ?h?ring (KS) in ??m??ni??.In th? study conducted b? H?, H?u, ?nd O h, they ?r?????d two models to ??n?tru?t KS ?r????? by introducing TRA ?nd game th??r? (GT). One m?d?l ???tur?? ??r??n?l psychological f??ling? (?ttitud?? and ?ubj??tiv? n?rm?), th? ?th?r model n?t only captures ??r??n?l feelings but ?l?? t?k?? ?th?r peoples decisions into ??n?id?r?ti?n.By ??m??ring th? two models, r????r?h?r? f?und th?t th? m?d?l based ?n TRA h?? a high?r predictive ???ur??? than th? m?d?l b???d ?n TRA and GT. Th?? ??n?lud?d th?t ?m?l????? have a high ?r?b?bilit? of n?t ?n?l?zing th? decisions of ?th?r?, ?nd wh?th?r t?king ?th?r colleagues d??i?i?n into ????unt h?? a gr??t impact on ????l?? KS behavioral int?nti?n.It is indi??t?d th?t th? m?r? indirect d??i?i?n-m?k?r? there ?r? in ?rg?niz?ti?n?, th? l??? ?ff??tiv? is KS. To ?n??ur?g? KS, ??m??n? m?n?g?r? ?h?uld ?v?id in?luding indir??t d??i?i?n-m?k?r? in the ?r?j??t?.C?n?um?r b?h?vi?rUse of R?n?w?bl? energyTRA h?? ?l?? b??n u??d to ?tud? consumer ?ttitud?? towards renewable energy. In 2000, B?ng, et. al f?und that ????l? who ??r?d ?b?ut ?nvir?nm?nt?l i??u?? like ??lluti?n w?r? m?r? willing t? ???nd more f?r renewable ?n?rg?.Simil?rl?, a 2008 ?tud? ?f Swedish consumers b? H?n?l? ?t. ?l showed th?t th??? who with a ???itiv? view ?f renewable ?n?rg? were more willing to spend m?n?? ?n ?u?t?in?bl? ?n?rg? for th?ir h?m??.Th??? ?tudi?? ?r? ?vid?n?? th?t th? emotional response ????l? have t?w?rd? a t??i? ?ff??t? their ?ttitud?, whi?h in turn affects their b?h?vi?r?l int?nt. These ?tudi?? ?l?? ?r?vid? examples f?r h?w th? TRA is used t? m?rk?t g??d? th?t might n?t m?k? the m??t sense fr?m a ?tri?tl? economic ??r????tiv?.Th? u?? ?f C?u??nC?u??n u??g? has ?l?? been ?tudi?d thr?ugh th? theory ?f reasoned action fr?m?w?rk b? r????r?h?r? interested in consumer ?nd m?rk?t?r b?h?vi?r.In 1984, Terence Shimp ?nd Ali??n K?v?? applied thi? th??r? t? coupon u??g? b?h?vi?r, with th? r????r?h premise that coupon u??g? is r?ti?n?l, ???t?m?ti?, ?nd th?ughtful b?h?vi?r in ??ntr??t with ?th?r ???li??ti?n? ?f the theor y t? m?r? d?ng?r?u? types ?f b?h?vi?r.The th??r? of reasoned action serves ?? a u??ful model because it ??n h?l? examine whether ??n?um?r? int?nti?n? t? u?? ??u??n? are determined b? their ?ttitud?? and ??r???ti?n? ?f wh?th?r im??rt?nt others think ?n? ?h?uld ?r ?h?uld n?t expend th? effort t? ?li?, save, ?nd u?? ??u??n?.Th? ??n?um?r? b?h?vi?r int?nti?n? are influenced b? their ??r??n?l b?li?f? ?b?ut ??u??n u??g?, m??ning wh?th?r or not th?? think ??ving m?n?? is important and are willing to ???nd th? time ?li??ing ??u??n?.These potential b?li?f? ?l?? influenced th? coupon u??r? th?ught? ?b?ut wh?t ?th?r? think ?b?ut th?ir u??g? ?f ??u??n?.Together, the coupon user will use th?ir ?wn beliefs ?nd th? ??ini?n? ?f ?th?r? to f?rm ?n ?v?r?ll attitude t?w?rd? coupon u??g?. T? ???r???h this study, Shim? ?nd Ali??n surveyed 770 h?u??h?ld? and m???ur?d th? aspects of th? TRA m?d?l in terms of th? participants r????n???.The received r????n??? indi??t?d th?t ??n?um?r? n?rm? are ??rti?ll? deter mined b? th?ir ??r??n?l b?li?f? toward ??u??n u??g?, and to an even gr??t?r ?xt?nd, that attitudes ?r? influenced b? internalizations ?f ?th?r? b?li?f?.Positive ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? this b?h?vi?r ?r? influ?n??d b? ?n individu?l? ??r???ti?n? th?t th?ir ??rtn?r? will b? satisfied b? their tim? ???nt ?nd ?ff?rt? made to save m?n??.Br?nd loyaltyTRA has been applied t? r?d?fin? brand loyalty. According t? th? th??r? ?f r????n?d ??ti?n, th? antecedents ?f ?ur?h??? behaviour ?r? ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? th? purchase ?nd subjective norm.In 1998, Ha ??ndu?t?d a ?tud? t? investigate th? r?l?ti?n?hi?? ?m?ng ??v?r?l ?nt???d?nt? of unit brand l???lt? (UBL) b? intr?du?ing TRA. C?n?um?r? ?r? brand loyal wh?n both ?ttitud? ?nd b?h?vi?r are favorable. In his study, H? developed a t?bl? indicating 8 ??mbin?ti?n? ?f ?u?t?m?r? br?nd l???lt? based on th?ir l???lt? ?n 3 variables â€" ?ttitud? t?w?rd? th? b?h?vi?r, ?ubj??tiv? norm, ?nd ?ur?h??? b?h?vi?r i? l???l.A???rding t? Ha, m?rk?ting managers ?h?uld n?t b? di? ??ur?g?d b? a t?m??r?r? di?l???lt? and n??d to ?triv? f?r grabbing br?nd loyalty when ?u?t?m?r? ?r? ?h?wing loyalty to two ?f th? thr?? v?ri?bl??, but they need to r?di?gn??? th?ir ?u?t?m?r? br?nd l???lt? wh?n customers are ?h?wing loyalty t? only one ?f th?m.The m?in focus ?h?uld be ??int?d ?t ?ith?r ?nh?n?ing th? consumers ?ttitud? toward th?ir br?nd or ?dju?ting th?ir br?nd t? th? ???i?l n?rm?In H??lth behaviorEx?r?i??The ?ubli? health community, int?r??t?d in reducing ri?ing obesity rates, has used TRA to ?tud? ????l?? ?x?r?i?? b?h?vi?r.A 1981 ?tud? b? Bentler and S???k?rt r?v??l?d th?t int?nt to ?x?r?i?? was d?t?rmin?d b? a persons ?ttitud? t?w?rd ?x?r?i??, ?? ?r?di?t?d b? TRA.In a broader lit?r?tur? r?vi?w ?n the ?tud? of ?x?r?i?? u?ing TRA ?nd TPB, it w?? d?t?rmin?d th?t b?h?vi?r?l int?nt t? ?x?r?i?? is b?tt?r fr?m?d by TRA than TPB b???u?? ??r??iv?d b?h?vi?r?l ??ntr?l did n?t have a ?ignifi??nt ?ff??t on th? int?nt to ?x?r?i??.P?di?tri?i?n?, parents ?nd HPV vaccinationsA 201 1 study examining pediatricians behaviors ?urr?unding th? Human P??ill?m?viru? (HPV) v???in? f?und that TRA ?r?di?t?d the pediatricians would ?n??ur?g? ??r?nt? t? g?t th?ir daughters vaccinated.Roberto, Kri?g?r, K?tz, G??i, ?nd J?in discovered that the norms surrounding this t??i? were more important in ?r?di?ting behavior th?n ??r??iv?d behavioral ??ntr?l.S?xu?l ??ndu?t in high school ??ung l?di??In 2011, W.M. D??w?ll, Br?xt?r, Cha, and Kim examined ??xu?l b?h?vi?r in African Am?ri??n teenage girl? ?nd ???li?d the th??r? ?? a fr?m?w?rk f?r und?r?t?nding thi? b?h?vi?r.The th??r? ?f reasoned action can explain th??? b?h?vi?r? in that t??n? b?h?vi?r?l intentions t? ?ng?g? in ??rl? ??xu?l b?h?vi?r ?r? influ?n??d b? th?ir pre-existing ?ttitud?? ?nd ?ubj??tiv? n?rm? ?f th?ir ???r?. Attitud?? in this ??nt?xt are favorable ?r unf?v?r?bl? di????iti?n? towards t??n?g? ??xu?l b?h?vi?r.Subjective n?rm? ?r? the ??r??iv?d ???i?l pressure t??n?g?r? f??l from th?ir fri?nd?, ?l???m?t??, ?nd other ? ??r groups t? ?ng?g? in sexual b?h?vi?r.A? a fr?m?w?rk, the TRA ?ugg??t? th?t ?d?l????nt? will participate in ??rl? b?h?vi?r because of th?ir ?wn ?ttitud?? t?w?rd? the behavior and the ?ubj??tiv? n?rm? of their peers. In thi? case, intention is th? willful ?l?n t? ??rf?rm early sexual b?h?vi?r.Findings fr?m th? ?tud?nt ?h?w?d th?t the TRA w?? ?u???rtiv? in ?r?di?ting early sexual b?h?vi?r ?m?ng African Am?ri??n t??n?g? girl?.Attitud?? towards ??x ?nd subjective n?rm? b?th ??rr?l?t?d with int?nti?n? t? ??rti?i??t? in ??rl? ??xu?l behavior in th? ?tud?? sample.We ??n ???l? Theory Of Reasoned Action  t? thi? ?itu?ti?n and use it t? ?ur ?dv?nt?g?:(Adolescents’’) Attitud?:Curi??it? ?b?ut ??xD??ir? t? engage in ??x(Subj??tiv? N?rm):Parents d?n’t f??l comfortable di??u??ing sex openly (H?u?t?n, 2009)Ad?l????nt?’ perceive this ?? a ??nd?mn?ti?n of sexSin?? ??r?nt? d?n’t bring u? sex openly with t??n?g?r?, t??n?g?r? feel un??mf?rt?bl? bringing u? th? t??i?(Behavioral Int?nti?n):Ad? l????nt? ?ng?g? in ??x du? t? ?uri??it?, hormones, ?nd m?di? pressure but, they feel un??mf?rt?bl? discussing th?ir ??xu?l activity with ??r?nt? (Houston, 2009)Thi? ??uld l??d t? un??f? ??xParents ?r? ?l?? ?ft?n left un?w?r? ?b?ut their ?hild’? sexual activityB???u?? n? ?n? t?lk? ???nl? about ??x with th?m, ?d?l????nt? f??l as th?ugh sex is somewhat tabooMay thu? b? reluctant t? buy ??nd?m? or ?th?r ??ntr????tiv??Wh?t C?n B? D?n?:Th?r? i? clearly a problem regarding t??n?g?r? ?nd ??f?, inf?rm?d sex, ?nd the r??t ?f thi? problem ??n b? tr???d t? sexual ?du??ti?n. In ?rd?r t? promote a h??lthi?r r?l?ti?n?hi? with ??x, h??lth ?du??t?r? need to f??u? ?n d?v?l??ing ?r?gr?m? that ?h?w t??n?g?r? th?t ??xâ€"?nd ??f? sexâ€"is n?thing t? b? ?mb?rr????d ?b?ut.These ?r?gr?m? ??rh???, ?h?uld include pamphlets d??ign?d for ??r?nt? th?t teenagers n??d t? ?h?w t? (and have ?ign?d by) parents th?t remind them that ???nl?, and comfortably, di??u??ing ??x with th?ir t??n?g?r? i? m?r? b?n?fi?i?l th?n hurtful t? th?m.Providing ?n ?nvir?nm?nt wh?r? t??n?g?r? ??n openly talk ?b?ut sex â€"wh?th?r it b? that th?? are considering becoming ??xu?ll? ??tiv?, ??ntr????tiv? ??ti?n?, ?r ?th?r ??xu?ll? r?l?t?d questionsâ€" with th?ir parents will lead to a h??lthi?r ?ttitud? toward ??x, ?nd thu?, ??f?r ??x.Besides th? pamphlets f?r ??r?nt?, th? program f?r ??xu?l education d??ign?d b? h??lth ?du??t?r? should (?bvi?u?l?) t???h t??n?g?r? about ??f? ??x, but in such a way th?t d??? n?t im?l? th?t sex is ??m? ??rt ?f taboo act th?t should n?t b? ?ng?g?d in ?r?f?r?bl?.It has ??tu?ll? b??n f?und th?t in ??untri?? like th? N?th?rl?nd?, where t??n?g?r? ?r? t?ught ??xu?l ?du??ti?n in a more open m?nn?r ?nd ??r?nt? feel ??mf?rt?bl? discussing sex with th?ir ?hildr?n, t??n?g?r? h?d a h??lthi?r relationship with sex (H?u?t?n, 2009). With th??? ?h?ng?? the Theory of Reasoned Action  m?d?l ??uld thu? ?h?ng? t? thi?:(Ad?l????nt?’’) Attitude:Curiosity ?b?ut sexD??ir? t? engage in ??xAn int?r??t in ??x i? n?tur?l, ?nd nothing t? be ?mb?rr????d aboutThi? ??n b? ??hi?v?d thr?ugh m?r? open ??xu?l education programs(Subj??tiv? N?rm):P?r?nt? feel comfortable discussing ??x openlySince ??r?nt? can bring u? ??x openly with t??n?g?r?, t??n?g?r? feel ??mf?rt?bl? di??u??ing ??x(B?h?vi?r?l Int?nti?n):Adolescents ?ng?g? in ??x du? t? curiosity, h?rm?n??, ?nd media pressure and f??l comfortable discussing th?ir ??xu?l activity with parentsThi? ??n l??d to ??f?r ??xP?r?nt? will b? m?r? inf?rm?d of sexual activityCan bu? ??nd?m? other ??ntr????tiv?? without f??ling ?h?m? ?r ?mb?rr???m?ntC?nd?m u??TRA h?? been fr??u?ntl? used as a fr?m?w?rk ?nd predictive m??h?ni?m of applied r????r?h ?n ??xu?l b?h?vi?r, especially in ?r?v?nti?n ?f ??xu?ll? tr?n?mitt?d di????? such ?? HIV.In 2001, Alb?rr??ín, J?hn??n, Fi?hb?in, ?nd Mu?ll?rl?il? ???li?d th??r? ?f reasoned ??ti?n (TRA) and th??r? ?f ?l?nn?d b?h?vi?r (TPB) int? ?tud?ing h?w well th? th??ri?? predict ??nd?m use.T? b? consistent with TRA, the ?uth?r ? ??nth??iz?d 96 data ??t? (N = 22,594), ?nd ?????i?t? ?v?r? ??m??n?nt in ??nd?m u?? with certain w?ight. Their study indicates th?t th? th??ri?? of r????n?d ??ti?n and ?l?nn?d b?h?vi?r are highly ?u?????ful ?r?di?t?r? of ??nd?m u??.A???rding to th?ir discussion, ????l? ?r? more likely to use ??nd?m? if th?? h?v? ?r?vi?u?l? f?rm?d the ??rr????nding int?nti?n?. Th??? int?nti?n? t? use condoms ?????r to d?riv? fr?m ?ttitud??, subjective n?rm?, and perceived behavioral ??ntr?l.Th??? ?ttitud?? ?nd n?rm?, in turn, appear t? derive fr?m ?ut??m? ?nd n?rm?tiv? b?li?f?. Nevertheless, wh?th?r b?h?vi?r w?? ???????d r?tr?????tiv?l? ?r ?r?????tiv?l? was ?n important m?d?r?t?r that influ?n??d th? magnitude of th? ?????i?ti?n? between theoretically im??rt?nt v?ri?bl??.

The Timeline for the End of the Roman Republic

This  timeline uses the Gracchi brothers attempt at reform as the starting point and ends when the Republic has given way to the Empire as evidenced by the rise of the first Roman emperor. The Gracchi brothers were  Tiberius Gracchus and Gaius Gracchus. The two  of them were politicians who represented the commoners in the Roman government. The brothers were progressive activists interested in land reforms to benefit the poor. In the 2nd century B.C,  the two  of them  tried to reform Romes social and political structure to help the lower classes.  Events surrounding the politics of the Gracchi led to the decline and eventual fall of the Roman Republic. Overlaps in Roman History Since beginnings and ends overlap, the final entries of this timeline could also be looked at as the beginning of the succeeding era of Roman history, the Imperial period. The beginning of the final period of Republican Rome likewise overlaps the middle of the Roman Republican period. The  End of the Roman Republic   133 B.C. Tiberius Gracchus tribune 123 - 122 B.C. Gaius Gracchus tribune 111 - 105 B.C. Jugurthine War 104 - 100 B.C. Marius consul. 90 - 88 B.C. Social War 88 B.C. Sulla and the First Mithridatic War 88 B.C. Sullas march on Rome with his army. 82 B.C. Sulla becomes dictator 71 B.C. Crassus crushes Spartacus 71 B.C. Pompey defeats Sertorius' rebellion in Spain 70 B.C. Consulship of Crassus and Pompey 63 B.C. Pompey defeats Mithridates 60 B.C. First Triumvirate: Pompey, Crassus, Julius Caesar 58 - 50 B.C. Caesar conquers Gaul 53 B.C. Crassus killed in (battle) of Carrhae 49 B.C. Caesar crosses the Rubicon 48 B.C. Pharsalus (battle); Pompey killed in Egypt 46 - 44 B.C. Caesars dictatorship 44 B.C. End of Civil War 43 B.C. Second Triumvirate: Marc Antony, Lepidus, Octavian 42 B.C. Philippi (battle) 36 B.C. Naulochus (battle) 31 B.C. Actium (battle) 27 B.C. Octavian emperor

Alice in Wonderland Essay - 1250 Words

Alice in Wonderland Alice in Wonderland by Charles L Dodgeson (Lewis Carrol) is a classic masterpiece and example of great literature. Many people know of this book as merely a child’s tale or a Disney movie. As both were adopted from the book, many of the ideas were not. I have my own feelings and opinions of this book. Remarkable use of words and an originally creative theme and plot structure are both used in this book. The author of this novel used many hidden meanings, symbolism, and ambiguous terms to greatly describe the actual nature of the story. Many people have different views as to the type of book it is and the novel’s actual meaning. Although this book inspires many people to laugh, it also inspires them think.†¦show more content†¦The Turtle is sad, so Alice and the Gryphon sing for it. Trial started when Alice was dragged in. The trial is for the Jack of Hearts is accused of stealing the Queen’s tarts. Judge of the trial is the King, with some animals as the jury and the White Rabbit as the court herald. The Mad Hatter is called as a witness and Alice starts to grow in her seat. When she gets up, she knocks the jury off the box and has to put them back in. When the King and Queen try to condemn the Jack, Alice yells at them. Then The King and Queen are very rude to Alice until she loses her temper. She yells at the cards and gets into a fight with them. Suddenly, they all leap on her. Alice then finds herself lying on the riverbank with her sister helping her. Her sister is told all about Alice’s dream and then Alice has some tea. She thinks about weather she will remember her adventures when she grows older and has her own children. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;This book, in my opinion, uses many examples of symbolism and ambiguous terms and comments. It also has some great themes. Expressed examples of this are found throughout the novel. I think that this novel may have been influenced by the use of opium. In the author’s time, opium was habitually used in 5 out of 6 families. The caterpillar smoking was probably alluding to the use of opium. Also, the caterpillar talking about the mushroom would do to Alice if she ateShow MoreRelatedAlice Of Wonderland By Alice Walker1159 Words   |  5 Pages†¢ Alice is the main character in Alice in wonderland because she is the first character mentioned in the play and the story is named after her. Alice is also a shy girl â€Å" Alice very quietly wandered away and sat down under a tree†pg2 †¢ Alice in wonderland takes place during summer in a magical place called wonderland. I know this because the play is called Alice in wonderland. â€Å"One warm and quiet summer afternoon, a little girl named Alice was in her garden†Read More Reflective Essay: Alice in Wonderland1521 Words   |  7 PagesThere and back again with Alice I gasp my hands on my knees, bent over, out of breath. I can feel my lungs compressing and pushing hard against my chest in an effort to fit just a little more air. My palms are wet, beads of sweat trickle down my forehead, making my hair feel wet and sticky. My shirt is drenched in sweat. I stare at the ground and see the stalks of grass, standing tall like trees to the tiny ants that scurry among them. What I must look like to those minuscule creatures, like a giantRead MoreAlice in Wonderland Literary Analysis Essay1690 Words   |  7 PagesAlice In Wonderland Literary Analysis Many themes are explored when reading Lewis Carrol’s, Alice in Wonderland. Themes of childhood innocence, child abuse, dream, and others. Reading the story, it was quite clear to see one particular theme portrayed through out the book: child to adult progression. Alice in Wonderland is full of experiences that lead Alice to becoming more of herself and that help her grow up. It’s a story of trial, confusion, understanding, and success. And more confusion. ThoughRead MoreAlice s Journey Through Wonderland958 Words   |  4 Pages Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is fundamentally about the growth of the character of Alice. In the Victorian period 1837- 1901, there was a changes in children education and reflexively development of children literature. Therefore when writing Lewis Carroll attempts to put forth a form of education within the text. The story follows Alice who is a seven year old well-mannered victorian girl that stumbles through a rabbit hole into th e magical world of Wonderland. Alice takes on the role of theRead MoreAnalysis Of The Mad Hatter In Alice In Wonderland1576 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction: In Disney’s Alice in Wonderland, a twenty-year-old girl named Alice Kingsley experiences very strange dreams ever since she was child. She dreams of a smiling cat, a white rabbit in a waist coat, a blue caterpillar and much more unusual things. At her surprise engagement party, Alice was walking in the garden when she noticed something strange. To her surprise, she saw a white rabbit in a waist coat that looked exactly like the one in her dreams. Suddenly, Alice becomes overwhelmed atRead MoreAlice s Wonderland : Carbon Copy1186 Words   |  5 PagesAlice in Wonderland Masterpiece: Carbon Copy Can a perfect Alice movie be made by only mixing and matching aspects of more than one movie? If so, how would it be accomplished? I propose that it can be done and this paper has compile information showing by finding the perfect Alice Character, sticking to the true spirit of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland original story line, incorporating the right visual and special effects, as well as, the best animation, sound, art direction, and the bestRead MoreWhat Really Happened to Alice in Wonderland1336 Words   |  5 PagesWhat Really Happened In Wonderland... It was a bright, sunny day in the Red Queen’s rose garden when all of a sudden I heard my name being called. â€Å"WHERE IS THAT WHITE RABBIT?!† yelled the Queen. â€Å"Oh no†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ I thought. I felt myself being pulled out of my hiding place from under the bushes. â€Å"There you are† the Red Queen scowled. â€Å"I need you to fetch me a girl named Alice and bring her back to me immediately† she said again. â€Å"Alice?† I managed to breathe out. â€Å"Yes† she said. â€Å"And I need her here beforeRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of The Mad Hatter In Alice In Wonderland1600 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction: In Disney’s Alice in Wonderland, a twenty-year-old girl named Alice Kingsley experiences very strange dreams ever since she was a child. She dreams of a smiling cat, a white rabbit in a waistcoat, a blue caterpillar and much more unusual things. At her surprise engagement party, Alice was walking in the garden when she noticed something strange. To her surprise, she saw a white rabbit in a waistcoat that looked exactly like the one in her dreams. Suddenly, Alice becomes overwhelmed atRead MoreAlice in Wonderland889 Words   |  4 PagesIdentity Crisis Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland follows the story of young Alice trapped in the world of Wonderland after falling down through a rabbit-hole. The rabbit-hole which is filled with bookshelves, maps, and other objects foreshadows the set of rules, the ones Alice is normally accustomed to, will be defied in Wonderland. This conflict between her world and Wonderland becomes evident shortly after her arrival as evinced by chaos in â€Å"Pool of Tears† and Alice brings up the main theme of theRead MoreEssay on alice and wonderland1866 Words   |  8 Pages Finding the Child in Us All Lewis Carroll’s classic Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland has entertained not only children but adults for over one hundred years. The tale has become a treasure of philosophers, literary critics, psychoanalysts, and linguists. It also has attracted Carroll’s fellow mathematicians and logicians. There appears to be something in Alice for everyone, and there are almost a s many explanations of the work as there are commentators. It may be perhaps Carroll’s fantastical style

Management position within hospitality industry Free Essays

The most complex work in the hotel in terms of communication and of coordinating and completing working documents is done by Floor Managers. These employees often supervise others who perform service tasks directly for the guests. Floor Managers are responsible for liaising between Room Attendants on the guest floors and managers in the housekeeping office. We will write a custom essay sample on Management position within hospitality industry or any similar topic only for you Order Now Qualifications required are a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in hotel management, and work experience in hospitality industry. At the basement-level housekeeping office, Floor Managers report and monitor room status and special room requests received from other parts of the hotel. They check the computer-generated status reports for discrepancies from their visual checks of the actual rooms. If a room coded for check-out appeared occupied on the floor, they would check the Expected Departure report on the computer to see if the guest had actually checked out (Bardi 2002). Usually, the main requires are: Supervision Inventory management Quality Control Coordination of other managers and staff Shipping and receiving Documentary control (Floor Manager Position 2007). The responsibilities are: Each one supervises 15 Room Attendants and two Housemen, covering three to four floors, or 240–320 rooms. On the floors, they check the status and progress of room cleaning, inspected rooms and augmented the Room Attendants’ work. One of their duties, for example, is putting triple bed sheets and extra amenities in VIP rooms. They have to get the extra sheet, then take some of the bedding off and remake the bed. The number of VIPs they had to do beds for is never predictable, and they have to squeeze them into their regularly scheduled activities. The number of floors and rooms Floor Managers are responsible for varied, too, because of airline employee guests, who rarely checked out until after the day shift finished, and because of movement in the predicted house counts (overall room occupancies) (Powers and Barrows 2002). The Floor Managers are all in the office together at three times during the day: the beginning and end of the shift, and during the midmorning clearing and briefing meeting. These are busy, but not clearly structured times, with managers picking up special supplies, double-checking irregularities in the room status reports, answering phones. In Hilton Hotels, for instance, Floor Managers work is organized as follows: workday starts, between 7 and 8; the Floor Managers come in and prepared their own worksheets for the day; they check the 6:30 a.m. room status reports and special requests, along with the log book confirming their floor assignments;  then they go up on the floors to check the room status and supply needs with each Room Attendant, who has verified their status as soon as she/he arrives on the floor; Floor Managers then return downstairs to check and adjust room assignments against the Coordinator’s log book (Powers and Barrows 2002). For example, some rooms in the early-morning computer status report noted as vacant and clean may have become occupied in the interim. Or vacant and clean rooms may have become VIP or rush rooms, which Floor Managers would hear about in the office and have to inform the Room Attendant about. In many cases, Floor Manager’s position is called a â€Å"supervisor†. Floor Managers themselves have to identify VIP rooms and they have to spend extra time to set up the rooms, and collect and deliver the extras. The VIP rooms could not be neglected, and they are seldom blocked (assigned by Front Desk) in advance. So throughout the day, Floor Managers have to monitor upcoming VIP rooms and prepare them in time for the guests’ arrival (Powers and Barrows 2002). Work stress and pressure is a remarkable feature of this position. Very often, checking room reports against their lists, for example, is interrupted by a ringing telephone or a co-worker’s query. Most often the interruption involves a guest’s urgent request, which demanded an immediate response. People write down notes, speak on the phone to guests, page others to fill requests and relay orders to the Centralized Action Room. Several talks at once; seldom are the exchange restricted to two people (Stutts 2001). Floor Managers work primarily from photocopied forms attached to clipboards that they fill out each day as they completed their work. The worksheets serve as organizational tools, memory aids and long-term records, to be boxed and stored for a prescribed number of years. From my observations throughout the hotel, the computers stored information on sales, purchases, personnel and payroll, and guests and occupancy rather than any detailed records of daily work. And unless each Floor Manager is equipped with a hand-held computer, inputting such information would have been impractical when there is already a paper record. In the basement office, Floor Managers also check for recent special requests like rush rooms or VIPs, or they receive them as phone messages, occasionally via pager (Stutts 2001). References Bardi J.A. (2002). Hotel Front Office Management Wiley; 3 edition. Floor Manager Position (2007). Retrieved 01 July 2007, Powers T., Barrows C.W. (2002). Introduction to the Hospitality Industry. Wiley, 5 edition. Stutts A. (2001). Hotel and Lodging Management. An Introduction. Wiley. How to cite Management position within hospitality industry, Essay examples

The Book of Judges Essay Example For Students

The Book of Judges Essay The book of Judges is the sequel to Joshua. It is the seventh book of the Old Testament. It recounts stories and events from the death of the hebrew leader and prophet Joshua to the birth of the hebrew Samuel. That is roughly, from the end of the Israelite conquest of Canan in the 13th Century B.C to the begining of the monarchy in the 11 th century B. C. It tells about the hebrews from Joshuas Death to the time of Samuel. It was written in about 550 BC, on tablets named the Ras Shamra tablets. The Ras Shamra tablets where later discovered in the early 20th Century, even though the stories and acountings of the judges where already known and written. We will write a custom essay on The Book of Judges specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The book of Judges belongs to a specific historical tradition which is called the Deuteronomic history. The author of the book of Judges, was in exile in Babylonia. While in exile he was deeply concerned with foreign domination. So he wrote many of his stories on the migration of the tribe of Dan to the North and the sins of the Benjamites. The author emphasized that Israel was being influenced by foreign powers and the loss of freedom and prosperity. Recurring throughout the book is the stereotyped formula: The people of Israel did what was evil in the sight of the lord. Then after each period or subjection the author introduces another formula: But when the people of Israel cried the Lord, the Lord raised up a deliverer for the people. Through-out the book, the book of judges tells about prophets, rulers and influencial people such as: Othniel, Ehud, Shamgar, Deborah, Gideon, Tilian and Samson. There are also many more minor people. The name of the book is very deceptive, because there werent any judges at all, nor any judges notified of this book been written. The word Judges was actually a translation for the hebrew word Shofet which signifies a ruler or a great military ruler, which through out the book, influencial people such as Samson and or even Joshua are described as the Judges. The book of judges is supprisingly part of the book of prophets, because many prophets are mentioned and reported apon. The stories start with the conflict then end usually with the resolution. The resolution is often the Israelites asking for Gods forgiveness. The structure of the book of Judges is quiet complex. The introduction of the conquest of Canaan and a characterization of the period of the judges. The main body of the book consists of narratives about the judges. The book concludes withe supplements about the migration of the tribe of Dan to the North and about the sins of the Benjamites.